My overall satisfaction with this journal’s editorial process is high, which strongly reinforces its credibility in our field. The peer review was remarkably rigorous yet constructive; reviewers provided deep, technical insights that significantly improved the manuscript’s clarity and argumentation, rather than superficial checks. The editorial office demonstrated exceptional professionalism through timely, transparent communication at every stage, from initial submission to final acceptance. The production team also deserves praise for meticulous copyediting and swift proof handling, which minimized post-acceptance delays. While the revision timeline was somewhat tight given the complexity of our supplemental data, the editorial team accommodated a reasonable extension without friction. Crucially, the journal adhered strictly to its stated ethical guidelines and open-data policies, which gave me confidence in the integrity of the publication. This positive experience, marked by fairness, efficiency, and high production quality, makes me highly likely to submit future work here and recommend it to colleagues, as the journal clearly values both scientific soundness and author experience. My only minor suggestion would be to offer more flexible formatting templates during initial submission to reduce administrative overhead, but this does not detract from the journal's overall trustworthiness.